fidesz-eu.hu

News « Back to list

Power and legitimacy: the media

2011. 01. 31.

The media enjoy a remarkable status in democratic political systems. In effect, they claim an autonomous legitimacy which is inherent in their functioning and are neither accountable nor required to be transparent. They must, of course, observe the law, but there are always grey areas in legal regulation and media will generally look for an interpretation favourable to itself, as can be expected.

The ideal which legitimates this extraordinary power of the media is that they play a neutral role in intermediating between different political actors and sites of power – the legislature, government, judiciary, the demos, civil society and so on. Further, the media are supposed to be in charge of producing the first draft of history.
 
In reality, the role of the media is never entirely neutral – no published text is ever wholly neutral – so that the media can only strive towards what can be called an objective, factual presentation of different points of view.
 
What we have seen in the last few decades, however, is a notable, qualitative shift in how the media play their role. The quest for balance and objectivity has to some extent been set to one side in favour of a much more partial, impact-driven form of presentation.
 
The way in which comment is mixed with reportage, the growing reliance on emotive language, the personalisation of issues, the omission of voices that do not support the narrative of the media are all palpable and bear out the argument that media have undergone a transformation that takes their role some distance away from the democratic ideal.
 
In this case, however, the legitimacy of media power necessarily depreciates, something that the media resolutely refuse to accept. Indeed, despite the sea-change, the media continue to legitimate their power by reference to the freedom of speech and, though less explicitly, to the intermediating function, even while both have declined in quality and quantity.
 
This development raises a number of questions.
[1] Do the media still deserve their privileged status within democratic systems, when they play their supposed role only intermittently, at best?
[2] Do other political actors have the right to demand that the media, as a primary intermediator, give them voice, when the content of the message in question may be regarded by the media as unsuitable?
[3] Who should have the right to determine the criteria by which the media determine what is worth publishing and what is not?
[4] Do the media have a responsibility towards the society in which they operate?
[5] What should be the relationship between the media and the democratically elected government?

[6] Who should have the last word in determining the nature, form and content of the public good, the bonum publicum, the media or the elected government?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

György Schöpflin

Contribution to the debate on “Journalism Ethics and Self-Regulation in Europe: New Media, Old Dilemmas”, Unesco, Paris, 27 January 2011



 Power and legitimacy: the media
Címkék: media, legitimacy